Skip to main content

Fallacies and biases in WSJ article (03/31/2023)

Fallacies and biases in WSJ article: Americans Are Losing Faith in College Education, WSJ-NORC Poll Finds





The article "Americans are Losing Faith in College Education" by the Wall Street Journal has a number of fallacies and biases.

One fallacy is that the article uses a small sample size to make a general claim about all Americans. The article cites a poll of 1,000 adults, but this is a very small percentage of the total population of the United States. It is possible that the results of the poll are not representative of the views of all Americans.

Another fallacy is that the article uses loaded language to make the reader feel a certain way about college education. For example, the article says that "Americans are losing faith in college education" and that "college is no longer worth the cost." These statements are loaded with negative connotations, which can make the reader think that college is a bad investment.

The article also has a number of biases. One bias is that it only presents one side of the issue. The article does not mention the many benefits of college education, such as increased earning potential and job opportunities. It also does not mention the fact that college can be a valuable experience for personal growth and development.

Another bias is that the article is written from a conservative perspective. The article cites a number of conservative think tanks and organizations, and it quotes a number of conservative politicians. This suggests that the author of the article is biased against college education and that they believe that college is a waste of money.

Overall, the article "Americans are Losing Faith in College Education" is biased and misleading. The article uses a small sample size, loaded language, and a conservative perspective to make the reader think that college is a bad investment. However, there are many benefits to college education, and the article does not present a balanced view of the issue.

Link to the article: Americans Are Losing Faith in College Education, WSJ-NORC Poll Finds - WSJ

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Logical Fallacies Fox News: Tucker Carlson Opinion

Fallacies found in Fox News opinion piece by Tucker Carlson.    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-extraordinary-amount-lying Firstly, the author uses a lot of loaded language, which can be seen as an attempt to manipulate the emotions of the reader rather than present a logical argument. For example, they refer to the lying as "hilarious," and they say that the lying is not sophisticated, but rather like a 5-year-old child. Secondly, the author presents a strawman argument by suggesting that everyone believed that Vladimir Putin blew up Russia's natural gas pipeline to Europe, and then argues that this is not true. However, this is not an accurate representation of what people believed or what was reported in the media. Many news organizations did report that the pipeline exploded, but there was disagreement over who was responsible. Thirdly, the author engages in ad hominem attacks by calling those who reported the story "people who lie for a living...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thomas Sowell Article Logical Fallacies and Biases

Let's analyze this article:  Article can be found here: https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/08/22/the-point-of-no-return The article presents an argument that the United States is at risk of destroying itself due to a degeneration in societal norms, highlighted by threats against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. While the article raises valid concerns about threats of violence and their potential impact on democracy and freedom, it employs several logical fallacies. First, the article presents a false dilemma by suggesting that the choice is between believing in laws or believing in mob rule. This oversimplifies the issue and ignores the possibility of other solutions. Additionally, the article engages in ad hominem attacks against progressives, calling their arguments sophistries, and misrepresents their position on the interpretation of the Constitution, suggesting that they want to interpret the Constitutional limits out of the way. Furthermore, the article in...
Post a Comment
Read more